Title: WP Readability Analysis
Author: SalvatoreDP
Published: <strong>2015 年 12 月 6 日</strong>
Last modified: 2015 年 12 月 6 日

---

搜索插件

![](https://ps.w.org/wp-readability-analysis/assets/banner-772x250.jpg?rev=1301600)

**该插件尚未通过WordPress的最新3个主要版本进行测试**。 当与较新版本的WordPress一起
使用时，可能不再受到维护或支持，并且可能会存在兼容性问题。

![](https://s.w.org/plugins/geopattern-icon/wp-readability-analysis_fafbfa.svg)

# WP Readability Analysis

 作者：[SalvatoreDP](https://profiles.wordpress.org/salvatoredp/)

[下载](https://downloads.wordpress.org/plugin/wp-readability-analysis.zip)

 * [详情](https://cn.wordpress.org/plugins/wp-readability-analysis/#description)
 * [评价](https://cn.wordpress.org/plugins/wp-readability-analysis/#reviews)
 *  [安装](https://cn.wordpress.org/plugins/wp-readability-analysis/#installation)
 * [开发进展](https://cn.wordpress.org/plugins/wp-readability-analysis/#developers)

 [支持](https://wordpress.org/support/plugin/wp-readability-analysis/)

## 描述

WP Readability Analysis is a wordpress plugin that calculates the index
 of readability
of a post or page using various methods: Gulpease, Gunning-Fog, Flesch and Flesch-
Kincaid. With these formulas we try to analyze how difficult it is to read a text.

The method Gulpease, calibrated for the Italian language, unlike the other
 is based
on word length in letters rather than syllables.

Methods Flesch-Kincaid and Flesch, who are the most famous, using formulas based

on the average number of words per sentence and the average number of syllables 
per word.

The method Gunning-Fog uses a formula based on the average number of words per
 
sentence and the percentage of words with 3 or more syllables.

Unlike Gulpease, these three methods are mainly used in the English language.
 Both
Gunning-Fog that Flesch-Kincaid return a score which is the number of years of education
that the user must have to understand the text.

I invite you to know more about the various pages of wikipedia devoted
 to the various
formulas.

## 屏幕截图

 * [[
 * Plugin at working

## 安装

 1. Download the plugin and unzip it.
 2. Upload the folder readability-analysis to your /wp-content/plugins/ folder.
 3. 通过WordPress的“插件”菜单激活插件

## 评价

此插件暂无评价。

## 贡献者及开发者

「WP Readability Analysis」是开源软件。 以下人员对此插件做出了贡献。

贡献者

 *   [ SalvatoreDP ](https://profiles.wordpress.org/salvatoredp/)

[帮助将「WP Readability Analysis」翻译成简体中文。](https://translate.wordpress.org/projects/wp-plugins/wp-readability-analysis)

### 对开发感兴趣吗?

您可以[浏览代码](https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/wp-readability-analysis/)，
查看[SVN仓库](https://plugins.svn.wordpress.org/wp-readability-analysis/)，或通过
[RSS](https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/log/wp-readability-analysis/?limit=100&mode=stop_on_copy&format=rss)
订阅[开发日志](https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/log/wp-readability-analysis/)。

## 更新日志

#### 1.0

 * Fixed First Public release.

#### 0.5

 * First private release.

## 额外信息

 *  版本 **1.0**
 *  最后更新：**10 年前**
 *  活跃安装数量 **30+**
 *  WordPress 版本 ** 3.0.1 或更高版本 **
 *  已测试的最高版本为 **4.3.34**
 *  语言
 * [English (US)](https://wordpress.org/plugins/wp-readability-analysis/)
 * 标签
 * [analysis](https://cn.wordpress.org/plugins/tags/analysis/)[Readability](https://cn.wordpress.org/plugins/tags/readability/)
 *  [高级视图](https://cn.wordpress.org/plugins/wp-readability-analysis/advanced/)

## 评级

尚未提交反馈。

[Your review](https://wordpress.org/support/plugin/wp-readability-analysis/reviews/#new-post)

[查看全部评论](https://wordpress.org/support/plugin/wp-readability-analysis/reviews/)

## 贡献者

 *   [ SalvatoreDP ](https://profiles.wordpress.org/salvatoredp/)

## 支持

有话要说吗？是否需要帮助？

 [查看支持论坛](https://wordpress.org/support/plugin/wp-readability-analysis/)

## 捐助

您愿意支持这个插件的发展吗?

 [ 捐助此插件 ](https://www.salvatoredp.it/wp-readability-analysis)